3. Scheme design and environmental benefits
3.1 Introduction to Strawbale Construction
Loadbearing strawbale is a very appropriate technology to use for this affordable housing development. Not only is it easy to build with, but also experience and testing has shown it to be structurally strong and highly efficient at retaining warmth and preventing overheating in summer. In addition, the fire, acoustic and air tightness performance far exceeds the requirement of building regulations. It is very possible to improve on this specification and performance and create a house that requires little or no outside heating (see Appendix 6) but this is outside the scope of this Project Plan. The durability of strawbale houses is the one area where there is little empirical evidence but the oldest strawbale house in Europe was built in 1921 while there are several structures in the US that are around the century mark. If these houses are built to high construction standards and maintained properly they will at least exceed the 50-year design lifetime of most conventional housing.
The preferred method of construction for this development will be “Nebraska” or Loadbearing. In this method, the bales themselves take the weight of the roof; there is no other structural framework. They are placed together like giant building blocks and pinned to the foundations and to each other with hazel pegs. On top of the strawbale wall is placed a “roof plate” which spreads the floor and roof loads across the width of the wall. The roof plate is fastened to the foundations and the bales with hazel pegs and strapping, and the roof is constructed using either prefabricated timber trusses or a traditional cut roof.
Windows and doors are placed inside structural box frames, which are pinned into the bales as the walls go up, or they are fixed into 100 x 100mm uprights attached to the base plate and fed through slots in the wall plate. This is the simplest method as it requires little previous knowledge of wall construction. The majority of straw buildings in the UK are constructed using this method. Owner builders tend to prefer it because of its simplicity, ease of design, minimal use of timber, and the opportunity it affords for community involvement.
Advantages:
- A fast, simple, straightforward, low-cost and accessible building method
- Easy for non-professionals to design, following readily comprehensible basic principles.
- Designs from one room to two-storey homes can be created using a simple, step by step approach.
- Curves and circles are easy to achieve, for little extra cost.
- The straw is very forgiving. Total accuracy in plumb is not a design goal but wide variations can be brought back into shape easily.
- Great versatility of design shape.
Areas for further clarification:
- The straw must be kept dry throughout the whole building process until it is plastered, which can be very difficult on a large building, or one that is being constructed slowly.
- Openings for windows and doors should not exceed 50% of the wall surface area in any wall (but other methods can be used in these cases)
3.2 Design methodology
The proposed designs here draw on the expertise of the design methodology of amazonails. amazonails prides themselves on taking an efficient and effective approach to design, based on 14 years experience in both designing and building in straw. They do this by:
- The overall shape of the building is kept as simple as possible avoiding double corners and use of oddly shaped bales. This reduces the complexity of construction and the use of highly skilled labour.
- All the dimensions of affordable housing obey modular sizes of strawbales as well as sizes of available timber products (e.g. smartply sheets). This reduces the amount of rework that is required on site to cut down and retie bales.
3.3 Proposed designs
The proposed designs consist of 20 units of varying sizes from 58 m2 to 112 m2 arranged around a circular common house of around 200 m2. The units will all be south facing to make as much use of solar gain as possible and will be passively ventilated. Drawings are featured in Appendices 1-4 and include an indicative site layout on a 0.7 hectare site, front elevations and an example layout of a one bedroom studio flat. These were modelled on a potential site in inner west Leeds.
There will be a mixture of housing types and sizes which will allow the development to function as a multi-age, multi-need community. The following sizes of units are set out as follows:
Type Property type No. Area (sq. m) A1 1 bedroom 2 person flat 6 58 A2 2 bedroom 4 person flat 6 78 B1 3 bedroom 5-6 person house 5 90 B2 4 bedroom 6-8 person house 3 112 Total 20 1,602
3.4 Minimising energy in use and production
3.4.1 Overview of Climate Change in Yorkshire Although the Earth’s climate has changed many times over the millennia the term “climate change” usually refers to the changes observed since 1900. In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s most authoritative body on climate change, concluded that
“most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (man-made) greenhouse gas concentrations”. (UKCIP, 2009)
The UK Climate Impacts Programme or UKCIP, an initiative funded by Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, has established a series of possible scenarios through the use of computer modelling to aid in the integration of current understanding about climate change into decision making. These predictions reflect the best state of understanding in 2002. The latest version, UKCIP09, will be available in the summer of 2009 and will reflect the best of current understanding.
It is important to realise that there are significant sources of uncertainty in these models and that they have a number of different emissions scenarios and other variables. Using a medium emissions scenario and over the period to 2050, UKCIP has identified the following likely impacts of climate change in the Yorkshire and Humberside area (Weathering the Storm, Yorkshire and Humber Regional Adaptation Study, 2009).
· Annual average daily temperatures rising by almost 2°C; · Extreme hot temperatures will increase, with summer temperatures more regularly reaching 34°C; · A reduction in annual rainfall of up to 6%, although by less in upland areas; · Greater seasonality of rainfall, with increases in winter combined with significant reductions in summer; · In northern and upland areas an increase in the number of extreme rainfall events; · Dry spells (over 10 consecutive days without rain) are expected to increase in number; · Significant reductions in the number of days of frost and snow; · Marginal increases in winter average wind speeds, although summer and autumn speeds reduce slightly; · Sea levels will rise by around 0.35 metres.
These impacts can be expected to have a major effect on life in the area. There are large areas of Yorkshire and Humberside, particularly around the centre of Leeds and the East Riding of Yorkshire, that will be prone to river flooding due to increased rain in winter and increased numbers of extreme weather events (Environment Agency floodmap, 2009). This however, merely reflects the potential rise in river levels due to increased rainfall, not the effects of either a rise in sea level or run-off caused by extreme weather events both of which are likely to increase the areas prone to flooding.
Many current houses are not properly insulated as evidenced by winter snowmelt. This lack of insulation not only means that they are cold and unhealthy in winter but also get too hot on the sorts of extremely hot days predicted over the next few years. This sort of situation can lead to heat-related illness or even death in vulnerable people (S. Vandentorren, P. Bretin et al, 2006).
3.4.2 Strawbale design benefits
Strawbale houses have significant benefits over conventional timber frame or masonry houses in areas that will address many of the challenges posed by climate change. The design standards proposed here meet the AECB Silver Standard with potential to meet the AECB Passivhaus Standard which deliver an 80% reduction in carbon emissions compared to average for buildings. This kind of reduction approaches the standards as set out in the Code for Sustainable Homes Level 5.
a) Insulation values Insulation or “U” values are difficult to calculate but they indicate the amount of heat lost through one square metre of the material for every degree difference in temperature either side of the material. It is measured in units of watts per metre squared per degree kelvin. The lower the U-value the less heat is being lost through the material thus the more efficient an insulator it is. The UK Government introduced on 6 April 2006 amendment L1b to the existing Building Regulations in order to improve energy efficiency in buildings. The standard requirements for insulation were doubled in respect to the old regulations. In light of this the following table shows the insulation values of amazonails construction standard (Appendix 6) in relation to how they comply and exceed the new building regulations:
| Building Element |
part L1b (W/m2K) |
amazonails standard (W/m2K) |
| Wall |
0.30 |
0.14 |
| Windows |
1.80 |
1.80 |
| Roof |
0.20 |
0.12 |
| Floor |
0.20 |
0.20 |
The specifications regarding houses without any heating or cooling demand take the building insulation requirements much further (Appendix 6 for additional detail on these standards) .
|
AECB Silver |
AECB Gold / Passive House |
BRE Zero Heating House |
amazonails standard |
| Wall (W/m2K) |
0.25 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
| Windows (W/m2K) |
1.50 |
0.85 |
1.70 |
1.80 |
|
Roof (W/m2K)
|
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
|
Floor (W/m2K)
|
0.20 |
0.15 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
b) Fire Performance Rendered straw bale structures perform very well in fire situations. Research carried out by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and published in 2008 (V. Apte, G. J. Griffin et al, 2008) showed that exposing rendered strawbales to a heat flux of 50kWm−2 (approximately 700°C) for forty minutes initiated combustion of the strawbale 24 hours afterwards. By comparison the same tests at the same heat flux performed on gypsum wallboard achieved ignition in 41 to 43 seconds (McGraw, Mowrer, 1999).
This disparity is the result of the density of the strawbale and the consequential lack of oxygen available to the fire in the wall. It is important to note that the UK building regulations specify that for a loadbearing wall the minimum fire rating must be only 30 minutes (UK Building Regulations, Part B, 2006, Pg. 61).
C) Acoustic Performance Strawbale walls provide very good acoustic insulation properties with low reverberance (King, 2006 p.198). There are two main aspects to this sound insulation, a reduction in airborne noise and a reduction in impact noise.
The reduction in airborne noise is mainly due to the mass of the compressed strawbales and plaster render acting as a solid barrier between rooms, thus reducing the amount of sound energy that is transmitted. The strawbales, by their nature, are also very good at absorbing sound; as they are not a homogeneous mass, sound energy tends to be dissipated rather than transmitted by vibration.
The reduction in impact noise i.e. noise transmitted through structures by walking or moving across surfaces, is largely due to the method of floor construction. The floors are hung from the wall plates which are sandwiched by the strawbales in the walls. Sand is used as a damping agent so that the floors are acoustically decoupled from the hangers and the floor structure. Any vibration that is transmitted to the straw is not transmitted easily as discussed earlier.
Adding to the feeling of quiet, the plastered walls do not present a hard, reflective surface so the level of reverberation is very low.
d) Air tightness An air tightness test in accordance with BS EN 13829:2001 was carried out on a house built to amazonails standards. The following table shows the comparison of its results with UK Building Regulations and Association of Environmentally Conscious Builders (AECB) Silver Standard (Atkinson, 2008 and Appendix 6):
air permeability (m3/h/m2)
Building Regulations: 10
AECB Silver: 3
amazonails standard: 1.56
In order to achieve this level of air-tightness amazonails’ designs pay great attention to details around the frames of all openings in external walls.
e) Passive Solar Gain and Prevention of Overheating The affordable housing design proposed here makes maximum use of the natural light on site by ensuring the maximum number of windows face south. This has the benefit that during winter months, when it is the most needed, the low level sun penetrates through the windows, deep into the interior, maximising available natural heating and light throughout the whole house.
In summer, it is essential to minimise passive solar heat gain, because summer overheating is the most pronounced problem in super-insulated structures. Our design minimises the use of windows oriented towards east and west while using a large overhang on the south-facing windows. The reason for this is that it is always difficult to avoid unwanted summer heating gain provided by low morning and evening sunrays with east or west facing windows. The end result is that the interior of an amazonails affordable housing stays naturally cool during the summer, and at the same time it offers a naturally warm environment in winter.
f) Passive Stack Ventilation The staircase void creates a natural chimney which, at its highest point, is connected to a ventilation outlet. Wind passing across the top of the “chimney” pulls fresh air into the building at ground level through windows and doors. Slots in the interior doors connect any room separated from this void to it. The exceptions are bathrooms with separate naturally ventilated systems.
g) Structural Strength Loadbearing strawbale walls, once covered on the exterior with lime plaster and the interior with lime or clay plaster, may be considered to be analogous to a stressed skin panel (King, 2006 p.66). This type of panel is extremely strong, with the stiffness being provided by the plaster coatings while the mass of the strawbale provides the strength and ductility. A good example of the strength of this method can be found in California where an arched roof has been constructed using loadbearing strawbales and found to be able to withstand three times the seismic loads required under California building codes (Hartman, 2002).
As a comparison, Structural Insulated Panels or SIPs are a very similar construction with a thick layer of foam insulation sandwiched between two layers of Oriented Strand Board (OSB). Although these are structural panels the tensile and compressive strength is provided by the OSB, which in the case of the 225mm thick SIPs panels, is only 15mm thick. (www.siptec.co.uk accessed 25 June, 2009)
One of main differences between these two examples is that while the SIPs panel is uniform and homogeneous, the strawbale wall is heterogeneous and therefore extremely difficult to mathematically model. Testing and experience has shown, however, that a plastered straw bale wall can easily carry the vertical and lateral loads expected in a one or two-storey house thus rendering a post-and-beam frame redundant (King, 2006 p.61).
3.4.3 Materials choices There are a wide variety of materials used in the construction of a strawbale building. The table below summarises as many as possible and their embodied energy figures (Hammond, G; Jones, C 2008).
| Material |
Embodied Energy (MJ/Kg) |
Embodied Carbon (Kg C/Kg) |
Aggregate
|
0.10
|
0.005
|
Straw
|
0.24 |
0.01
|
Plywood
|
15.00 |
0.51
|
Slates
|
1.00
|
0.056
|
Clay
|
3.59
|
-
|
| Timber 2x glazed, argon filled, window |
360 |
18 |
Lime
|
5.30
|
0.74
|
| Wool (recycled) insulation |
20.9 |
-
|
| Paint (2 coats) |
20.4 |
1.06 |
Rubber
|
120
|
42
|
Sand
|
0.10 |
0.005
|
| Rammed earth |
0.45 |
0.023
|
Softwood
|
7.40
|
0.45 |
The extremely high figure for rubber does not take into account that the car tyres are reused and would otherwise end up in landfill.
In comparison the table below summarises the materials used in the construction of a standard masonry build.
| Material |
Embodied Energy (MJ/Kg) |
Embodied Carbon (Kg C/Kg) |
| Aggregate |
0.10 |
0.005 |
| Facing Bricks |
8.20 |
0.52 |
| Standard Bricks |
3.00 |
0.22 |
| Softwood |
7.40 |
0.45 |
| Slates |
1.00 |
0.056 |
| Plasterboard |
6.75 |
0.38 |
| Glass fibre insulation (quilt) |
28.00 |
1.35 |
| Gypsum plaster |
1.80 |
0.12 |
| PVC 2x glazed, argon filled, window |
2310 |
118 |
| Concrete |
0.95 |
0.13 |
| Concrete (1:1.5:3 eg in-situ floor slabs, structure) |
1.11 |
0.159 |
| Paint (2 coats) |
20.4 |
1.06 |
| Steel |
24.4 |
1.77 |
| Mortar |
1.55 |
0.213 |
Forward to next section: 4. Affordability and project costs Back to contents
Aggregate
|